The world is equally divided among the convinced, the defiant, and the
uncertain. There are those who have no doubts about their redemption,
salvation, and embrace by Jesus Christ; those who are militantly opposed to the
oppressive, patriarchal, and purely mythological god of the Bible; and those who
remain on the fence, neither here nor there, neither agnostic, atheistic, nor
partial believers. For them the idea of a sulfurous, eternal hell has no more
credibility than a heaven with angels and a warm, idyllic eternity; and for whom
even considering an in-between is tantamount to an intellectual capitulation.
But what about the tens of millions of others who fall in neither camp for
whom there might be a God, or not. If there is, then either their fate is
sealed, or subject to right works or faith. In either case, ginning up
enthusiasm or devotion seems ill worth it. At one end are those who choose to
live life to its fullest, at its most secular – the Epicureans, the hedonists,
and the self-indulgent. ‘Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die’. At
the other are the secularists who, committed to temporal reform and the hope of
human progress, are convinced they need no god to justify their good works which
have a Platonic life of their own.
In the vast middle are those who simply have no interest in either spiritual
salvation or secular progress. Those for whom the irony of having been created
with wit, intelligence, insight, and humor but consigned to spend eternity in
the cold, hard ground, could matter less. Those for whom the presence on
earth is mere happenstance, the collision of random fate-balls, and
insignificant in the scope of timelessness.
Those at the very end of the spectrum – far from consideration of meaning,
suffering from the angst and despair at the hopelessness of existence, or even
amused at God’s game of skittles – are life’s true survivors. They are
indifferent to God’s great plan of salvation, redemption, and eternal life;
dismissive of any claim to secular progress; and totally happy living a life of
blissful, unconcerned being.
‘We have no idea why or how we got here, what we are doing, or especially
where we are going, but we will follow our noses to find what’s what and where
it is’.
Note that these last are not interested in finding out what’s what,
but simply locating where it is. It is of no importance how it got to be, but
to what use it might be put.
Landry Comings was one such person. He went through Sunday services,
catechism class, and parochial high school without missing a beat. The mystery
of the Mass was no mystery all. It was most definitely grand guignol,
tamasha, and vaudeville (that lace, embroidery, and tailored finery!
Those bells, organ, and the Elevation! That showmanship and drama!) but nothing
spiritual or divine. He went because his parents made him; but true to keeping,
he made do with what he was dealt, and enjoyed the show more than anyone with
investment in its purpose.
As he grew older, he found himself in the vast minority. Most of his friends
and family belonged to one of the traditional categories of faith. They either
believed or were intellectually demanding about their reasons for lack of
faith. His Uncle Harry was a principled atheist who, having left the Church as
a young man but finding himself wandering without purpose or cause, devoted
himself to aggressively denying religion. His atheism had become in all but
name a religion. A vigorous, passionate, devoted denial of God was certainly as
profound a belief as any of his Benedictine brothers.
Landry, however, was convinced neither by the blandishments of those who
joined the Order nor his Uncle and friends who ridiculed even those with a
passing fancy for religion. He simply couldn’t care less about God, faith,
religion, or divine purpose.
Landry was one of the lucky ones who had never been burdened by the
responsibility of faith or the guilt associated with having no truck with it.
It was simply of no interest, no consequence, or import.
What freedom! Most people are either brought up in faith and obliged, come
hell or high water, to practice it – to abide by its commandments, to
participate in its ceremonies, pay service to or perform its liturgy – or live a
lifetime of guilt for having tossed it aside as irrelevant and meaningless.
Lapsed Catholics are the worst in this regard. Indoctrinated since birth, forced
into the religious servitude of Confession, Eucharist, and Matrimony, few have
the gumption or even resolve to question the Truth. Those that due pay an awful
price.
Landry, for reasons his parents could never understand, suffered neither from
exaggerated faith nor extreme guilt. Once he left home and the requirements of
his Easter Duty, he left the Church completely behind. He never looked back,
never doubted his decision – such as it was – and never gave a second thought to
the good burghers of New Brighton who still sat and listened to the bromides of
Father Brophy without even a fidget.
His father blamed his religious indifference on the Hayden Planetarium.
There, he reasoned, young Landry had gotten a glimpse of imponderable immensity
and rather than believe in its Creator, assumed what the Yale professor had
taught – randomness. The earth, the sun, the solar system, and the entire
universe was nothing more than fragments of the Big Bang, itself a product of
contracting gasses which in turn was a product
of…..ad infinitum recitations of random possibilities.
Laird could have gone either way but veered ‘Left’ and never came back.
His mother was convinced that his waywardness was because of a genetic
crossing between a great-great grandfather on his father’s side – a very consequential sinner – and a distant co-relational concubine. The concubine in her time had been as famous as Josephine Baker,
Mata Hari, and the Queen of Hearts of the Folies Bergeres. Religious belief is innate and hardwired, Landry’s mother
thought, and it was only natural that her son would turn out like his forbears.
‘He will come to his senses’, warned his Aunt Henrietta, ‘once the shadow of
the Grim Reaper falls upon his shoulder’. In other words, like most unbelievers
Landry would come to his senses once he could see the light dimming at the end
of the tunnel. No man can approach Death without divine sustenance.
Wrong again. Not only did Landry approach his finality with equanimity but
with good humor. If life was a bad joke, he said, than death could be no less. He refused religious counsel, was patient with and tolerant of his
grieving family; but knew that any sendoff into the unknown would have to be in
his own, one-man canoe.
Who could not want his existential indifference? The rest of us had
to deal with church, priests, revelation, and communion.
There was no category for Landry Comings on the Census form. No place for
him to check – no religious affiliation nor atheism. Up until the time of his
death the Bureau had not yet included an ‘Indifferent’ category, one which would
have approximated Landry’s approach to faith; but it will come. At first the
Indifferent will be those who have willy-nilly let religion slide. Then it will
include those who had it, but paid it no mind; and finally it will welcome those
who never, ever had even a scintilla of faith. The Landry Comings Option it
should be called.
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
To Believe Or Not To Believe, The Crunch At Heaven’s Gate - Confessions Of An Indifferent Man
Labels:
Politics and Culture
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.