Much has been made of the truth lately. The social media have written new fact-checking algorithms, journalists are like hounds after a deer, and politicians scratch and sniff to uncover wrongdoing covered up by lies, distortions, and misstatements.
Yet everyone knows that truth is an
overvalued commodity at best. We all exaggerate, embellish, invent, and
out-and-out lie; and today more than ever we get away with our deceit.
Politicians lie through their teeth and deny wrongdoing. Preachers
philander and filch until they are caught. Husbands look their wives
straight in the eye and tell the most outrageous, outlandish, barefaced lies.
Children lie about their whereabouts, CEO’s lie about mergers, buy-outs, and
downsizing.
Donald Trump, his opponents claim, is an inveterate liar, a shameless huckster with no respect for the truth. He tells barefaced lies, distortions, and exaggerations but, to his critics' surprise, his partisans are unconcerned. They extract the main messages from his hyperbole, melodrama, and Las Vegas showmanship. They have no interest in the ‘truth’ and could care less about statistical accuracy. They want no more carefully-worded statements of policy, no considered on-the-one-hand-on-the-other economic wishy-washiness. They want the meat and care little about the dressing.
Richard Nixon would baldly lie to hide is crimes and political dirty tricks, never flinch before the cameras, and never admit to any wrongdoing.
Bill Clinton used his particularly gifted
intelligence to do everything to hedge the truth but never actually lie.
His testimonies during the Monica Lewinsky scandal were examples of linguistic
parsing, philosophical needle-threading, and balletic moves, all devised to
hide the truth.
Politicians, preachers, and priests all seem to
be in the business of hiding the truth for personal gain or to cover up moral
failings.
The rest of us common American citizens are no
different. We lie and distort the truth to suit our needs, and do
anything to conceal our infidelity, waywardness, or financial
irresponsibility. The truth is there when it is unavoidable and
absolutely necessary, but not before.
The more complex and interactive the worldwide
web becomes, the more truth loses value yearly. A number of ‘quotes’ by
Pope Francis have been circulating on the web, the most popular of which is one
in which he says that belief in God is a nice amenity but not necessary to be a
good or moral person. Invented scripts attributed to Obama, the Dalai Lama,
Eisenhower, and the Buddha are everywhere. When called out, those who have
‘shared’ these quotes and sent them spinning through cyberspace only reply that
it is the sentiment that counts.
The truth pales in comparison with the ingenuity, balletic moves, and pure theatricality of invention, fantasy, and clever deceit. Ivan’s Devil in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov is a vaudevillian who tells Ivan that the world would be a very dull place without him. Goodness, truth, and morality are very overrated, and if we had to hew to the righteous road every day, we would be bored stiff. “Loosen up”, he admonishes Ivan. There is a time and place for moral rectitude and principle, but Lord knows, not always.
Sisela Bok in her book Lying said:
A good man does not lie. It is this intuition which brings lying so naturally within the domain of things categorically wrong. Yet many lies do little if any harm, and some lies do real good. How are we to account for this stringent judgment on lying, particularly in face of the possible trivial, if not positively beneficial, consequences of lying?
Imagine a world where every
statement is true; if “I’m just going to pop out to get a quart of milk”
was always exactly what the speaker intended? A world where ‘working late at
the office’ meant just that?. A world of absolute face value?
The thing of it is, we are all so used to
ignoring the truth and getting away with lies and deceit that it has become our
go-to option. Gender equality has leveled the marital playing field. No
one splits because of tomcatting or night prowling. Marriages of
convenience can withstand a lot of distortion; idealistic couples prefer to
ignore the truth; and dependent wives choose the lesser of two evils.
There is plenty of residual guilt to go
around. Men do indeed have their moments after crawling into bed,
showered, powdered, and mint-fresh beside their sleeping wives. They look over
at them and watch their sweet, untroubled, and innocent sleep; and feel
pangs of inconsolable guilt.
“How was your business meeting,
darling”, the wife asks, stretching and putting her arms around her husband’s
neck, kissing him on the cheek.
“What have I done?”, the husband thinks to
himself. “How could I have been such a deceitful cad?”; but of course, having
gotten away with his adultery, and surprised at how easy it was, any resolve
made at first light dissipates at the first martini and goes entirely after the
third.
Harlan Pritchard was at ease with
untruth. He had a silver tongue and an effusive charm which no one
could resist. Professors, women, colleagues, supervisors, and competitors
were all seduced by his grace, intimacy, and personal concern. They had
no interest in really knowing who he was, what motivated him, or from what
compassionate or spiritual spring his sympathy and understanding came. He
was so good at his elegant ballet, that people were enticed, engaged, and
finally hooked.
Charm and a silver tongue will get you
everywhere”, he told his young son. “The only lesson you will ever need to
know.” This bit of wisdom was of course not new, and ‘There’s a
sucker born every minute’ was the guiding principle of P.T. Barnum, the greatest
huckster in American history.
Although there have been plenty of pretenders to
his throne, none understood the absolute gullibility of the American consumer better than Barnum. No matter how exaggerated his claims or preposterous the
creatures in his side shows, people packed his big tent and kept coming back
for more.
Dostoevsky suggests that Christ was the original
huckster, offering man the promise of redemption and salvation but guaranteeing
him nothing and consigning him to a live of hunger and misery. Christ’s
rejection of the Devil’s temptations in the wilderness and His crafting of a
message of hope to billions who would follow him – “Man does not live by bread
alone” – was no more than a bill of goods.
Harlan Pritchard’s deliberate deception worked
like a dream. His silver tongue enabled him to lull even his harshest
professional critics. Hours of revisions of proposals, reports, and
company white papers were avoided because of his ability to convince people of
the irrefutable logic of his arguments and the rightness of his cause.
His ability to marginalize enemies and build
almost universal support among the staff gave him carte blanche. His charm was
so convincing that even his severest critics never knew that he had hung them
out to dry. He set his own hours, worked at his own pace, produced responsibly
if sometimes superficially, and had more time to himself and his personal
ambitions than anyone else he knew.
As Winston Churchill said, “Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip". Harland Pritchard was a master.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.