Louis XIV of France, the Sun King, social reformer, patron of the arts and culture, supported Molière, Racine, Pierre Mignard, Antoine Coysevox and Hyacinthe Rigaud, making their works famous throughout Europe. He founded the Académie Royale de Danse in 1661 and the Académie d'Opéra in 1669. Thanks to Louis France was able to establish colonies in the Americas, Asia, and Africa during his reign, and by the 1680s, France was a major power not just in Europe, but in the whole world.
The great kings of England from Henry II to Henry VIII established English sovereignty, reclaimed foreign land, and ruled over an increasingly united kingdom. The kings and queens of Holland and Spain, the Holy Roman Emperor, and centuries of powerful and influential popes consolidated and expanded European Influence and culture throughout their empires. The era of Spanish, Portuguese, English, and French exploration opened new lands to Western civilization, language, culture, and religion.
The campaigns to derogate whites and to raise non-whites to higher cultural significance are attempts to right a listing cultural ship. The contribution of white people to Western culture, say progressive activists, has been carried out on the backs of the poor, the enslaved, and the marginalized. Notre Dame, Chartres, Salisbury, the Coliseum, and the temples of Persepolis cannot be counted as positive investments in human development, but examples of exploitation, plunder, and abusive power. In other words, there can be nothing white worth noting, since all white achievements are tainted. The entire white race from its earliest beginnings to its sad and sorry end has been corrupt, pernicious, and dangerous.
Not only are the accomplishments of white civilization questionable, but the legacy of the white rule, empire, and political hegemony is like original sin - an innate corruption passed on from generation to generation ad perpetuam. It is about time to reject white history once and for all and to restore racial equilibrium, say social justice advocates.
Yet history is not so easily erased. The facts of empire cannot be expunged simply because they are looked at through a different lens. History is the story of empire, wealth, and high civilization. America is the beneficiary of European civilization, founded by Jefferson and his colleagues on its intellectual and moral principles.
The concept of ‘toxic whiteness’, an attempt to blame historical white rule for society’s current ills and to assume an innate moral corruption of whites because of their heritage, is the last, most desperate accusation of a political movement which has little intellectual foundation except the vague notion of ‘multiculturalism’, an ascribed value without the philosophical underpinnings.
Multiculturalists are not for anything but only against something. The French Revolution for all its excesses was based on principle – a democratic republic of universally applicable laws, rights, and privileges. After The Terror, France restored the aristocracy within a newly-constituted context. The aristocracy was still an important element in France’s historical primacy. Without the kings, queens, and courtiers of France, it would never have been la fille ainee de l’Eglise, the country that defeated the Saracens and saved Europe from Islamic rule, and the country whose art, literature, and thought would be models for the rest of Europe.
American multiculturalists would like to consider themselves latter-day French revolutionaries, but they have little of the Europeans’ cultural imperative. They have no substantive vision of a true structural reform, but only one of vague aspirations. They have never demonstrated or proven the inherent value of a culturally inclusive plurality. The original American ideal of democratic heterogeneity – all newcomers are welcome if they subscribe to the Founding Fathers’ notions of enterprise, discipline, family, God, and country – was based on the lessons of history and the philosophical principles of Greece and Rome and adopted by the Enlightenment. Contrary to progressive idealists, not only is there no higher value to a society based on racial heterogeneity per se – i.e. without subscription and adherence to universal norms and a Judeo-Christian ethos – but that peculiarly narrow understanding of foundational democracy is debilitating.
What does blackness, homosexuality, or gender have to do with higher moral enterprise? Such attributes are superficial characteristics only, and have nothing to do with foundational moral principles. Cato the Elder, a Roman educator, taught the future leaders of the empire not only the practical elements of leadership – strategy, management, organization, rhetoric, and policy – but the moral ones. Rome would never survive without a grounding in the moral principles of honesty, courage, discipline, compassion, respect, and honor. These principles were most important for Rome’s leadership, but essential for all. Modern China is still based on Confucian moral principles – an ethos, a philosophical foundation on which the society can be governed and prosper.
It is respect for and adherence to these fundamental principles which should guide America. Traits of gender, race, and ethnicity are superficial, secondary, and insignificant relative to them.
The idea of whiteness as an evil in and of itself is an outgrowth of this myopic focus on multiculturalism. It is not surprising that those who have raised ‘inclusivity’ to a higher moral order by fiat alone – that is without philosophical or historical grounding – are now vilifying those who are assumed to be its enemies. It is not enough to demand a just, fair, and equal society as Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin did; but to play a perverse zero sum game of racial politics. Only if white people are marginalized, dismissed, and removed from cultural importance can minorities thrive.
Modern progressives have cast society in absolute terms. There can be no historical subtlety or room for interpretation. Only the lens of race-gender-ethnicity has a clear focus. Only cultural relativism has philosophical value. Deconstructionism insists that there is no qualitative difference between slave journals and the works of Shakespeare. Both are no more than expressions of society and its cultural antecedents and are only simple records of the times in which they were written. They are absent of genius, creativity, or insight. Similarly all cultures are equal. Differences in development, achievement, or empire are irrelevant with no inherent value. With but an incidental twist of history, an African empire might have become preeminent.
Since white European civilization’s glory is nothing more than shadows on Plato’s cave wall, its legacy means nothing. Pride in ancestry is nothing more than a fading desire to retain supremacy.
Yet dismissing white European civilization as nothing more than an incidental, valueless bit of history denies its foundational values. It is no coincidence that all great cultures, both East and West, share the same principles. Cato the Elder and Confucius are only two examples. Respect for the past does not imply a vain hope for a resurgence of white supremacy in an age of threatening multiculturalism, but a validation for historical values.
While the American white population may be far removed from Ancient Greece, the Enlightenment, or Rome, it is still proud of its European heritage; and most resent the implication that legacy means nothing and that history is only fiction. The demonization of whites, toxic whiteness, and the political devaluation of European achievement, power, and importance can only be divisive, destructive, and dangerous.
However, American progressivism is in its Baroque period – a period of flourish, rhetorical excess, and overwrought ideas. Any culture which evolves to similar points where excess is the only value is doomed to eventual dismantling. A return to sanity, reflection, and reason cannot be far off.
Monday, May 20, 2019
Toxic Whiteness–The Final Act Of The Failed Farce Of Race-Gender-Ethnicity
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.